Some features of this site are not compatible with your browser. Install Opera Mini to
better experience this site.
Swirling Sediment Reveals Erosive Power of New England Storm
This page contains archived content and is no longer being updated. At the time of publication, it represented the best available science. However, more recent observations and studies may have rendered some content obsolete.
In February 2013, a nor’easter pounded the eastern United States, doing particular damage along the coast of New England. Wind gusts reached hurricane-force in several coastal states, raising a four to five-foot (1 to 1.5 meter) storm surge on top of astronomically high tides. The result was extreme beach erosion along the coast of Massachusetts and other coastal areas.
The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA’s Terra satellite captured glimpses of the storm’s effect on the coastal environment. The top image was taken on February 10, 2013, just hours after the nor’easter moved out to sea and several feet of fresh snow covered the landscape. The lower image was taken on January 20, 2013, and shows the surrounding waters at a quieter time. (Turn on the image comparison tool to see the difference.)
In February, plumes of tan and milky sediment swirl in the waters off of Cape Cod and the east coast of Massachusetts. According to Graham Giese, a marine geologist at the Provincetown Center for Coastal Studies, the suspended sediment was most likely comprised of silts and clays stirred up from the shallow seafloor. Cape Cod, Martha’s Vineyard, and Nantucket—as well as the shelves and shoals around them—were laid down as glacial deposits when large ice sheets retreated at the end of the last Ice Age. It is also possible (but less likely) that some of the discolored water is phytoplankton blooming in the wake of the storm.
“Those clouds of sediment over Nantucket Shoals consist of very fine sediment
eroded by large, wind-driven waves from the now-submerged offshore glacial deposits that form Nantucket Shoals,” Giese said. “They probably do not contain beach sand, which is a coarser ‘lag’ deposit left behind when waves cut into the glacial deposits at or near the shoreline.”
According to news reports, many beaches on the Cape and the South Shore of Massachusetts—particularly north- and east-facing towns like Sandwich—lost 15 to 20 feet (4 to 6 meters) of beach to erosion by the sea. Along the Cape Cod National Seashore, steep bluffs of sand and glacial deposits (some standing as high as 140 feet or 40 meters) were undermined by storm surges in many places. Many of the same beaches were battered in October by Hurricane Sandy and did not have much protection from the February storm. Public officials claimed that many beaches have lost more sand in the past year than in the previous ten.
Though coastal features are usually too small to spot in MODIS imagery, the February 10 image shows a new breach in the barrier known as South Beach, off the elbow of Cape Cod in the town of Chatham. “It is quite remarkable that your imager caught this breach so close to its initiation,” Giese noted.
State geologist Chris Weidman observed two cuts across the barrier island in person on February 10, noting that each was approximately 800 feet (250 meters) in width at high tide, with a small island in the middle. (About 1,600 feet total, or 500 meters.)
To view an aerial photo and ground-based video of the storm-changed coastline, visit our Earth Matters blog.