|
“In lakes, water quality relates directly to water clarity,” says Patrick
Brezonik. He is the Director of the Water Resources Center at the University of Minnesota and has been
testing the waters in the Upper Great Lakes region for the past 20 years. He says that in scientific
terms a lake with high water quality is known as an oligotrophic lake. Such a lake has clean, clear
water with little algae. It’s what most of us think of when we imagine a pristine lake in an untouched
pine forest. At the other end of the spectrum are hypereutrophic lakes. These polluted lakes are
typically murky, smelly, and overgrown with algae and exotic plants. |
|
|
|
Brezonik explains that lakes in the Upper Midwest typically deteriorate due to
runoff from farms, urban areas, industry, and construction sites. The storm water runoff will often
carry chemicals and sediments from these locations into nearby lakes. Sediments can cloud a lake, and
nutrients in the sediments, particularly phosphorous, can cause unwanted algae to grow. While the
degradation is gradual, once a lake has become hypereutrophic, it is very difficult to reverse the
damage.
A large drop in water quality can impact both the wildlife and the people in and around the lake. Rough
fish such as catfish and carp multiply and replace higher quality fish such as small mouth bass and
pike. Algae, bacteria, and chemicals can affect the health of people and animals who fish and swim in
the lakes. In addition, many small towns throughout the Upper Great Lakes region depend on tourist
dollars to keep their economies afloat, and an algae-filled lake turns away summer vacationers.
“It’s important for both the surrounding communities and the environment that lakes are monitored on a
regular basis,” says Brezonik. For the past century, the Secchi disk has been the standard instrument
for monitoring water quality. Pioneered by Italian physicist Pietro Angelo Secchi in 1865, the Secchi
disk is an 8-inch disk painted in an alternating black and white pattern. A person in a boat lowers the
disk into the lake and records the depth at which it disappears from sight. This depth, known as the
Secchi depth, is the measure of water clarity. In Minnesota, oligotrophic lakes have a Secchi depth of
16 feet or greater, and hypereutrophic lakes have a Secchi depth of only a few feet or less. If a lake
is hypereutrophic, it’s then up to the researcher or resource manager to determine the cause.
|
|
Hallet Lake (left) and Schwanz Lake (right), both in Minnesota, are
representative of very good and very bad water quality. Hallet lake is oligotrophic, with very clear water.
On the other hand Schwanz Lake is hypereutrophic, with murky water that is choked with algae. (Photographs
courtesy Upper Great Lakes Regional Earth Science Applications Center)
|
|
Although Secchi depths provide an excellent classification system for limnologists, taking such
measurements is labor intensive. The person making the measurements has to take a boat to the open part
of the lake, slowly drop in the Secchi disk, record its readings, and then repeat the process at several
other locations. While Secchi disk measurements work well for small numbers of lakes, they are not
practical for monitoring the over 30,000 lakes in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin.
Tom Lillesand, the director of the Environmental Remote Sensing Center at the University of Wisconsin,
explains that the states of the Upper Great Lakes region have modest budgets with which to monitor
lakes. “In Wisconsin we have a budget to sample lakes, but it allows agencies such as the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources to perform a complete ‘water quality physical exam’ on 50 to 100 lakes,
which is less than one percent of the state’s lakes,” he says. With such minimal coverage scientists
cannot obtain a comprehensive picture of water quality across the state, and they cannot follow trends
in water quality across the state over time.
Light from the Waves Testing the Waters |
|
Water quality measurements are typically done by hand with a Secchi
disk. Although the measurements are accurate, it would be very expensive to conduct them by hand on a large
scale. The photographs show decreasing water quality from left to right. (Photographs courtesy Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency)
|