Some features of this site are not compatible with your browser. Install Opera Mini to better experience this site.
Researchers aren’t just interested in land surface heating for the trivia. Land surface temperatures are directly related to human development of the land.
“The hottest temperatures were observed at locations without vegetation,” writes climatologist Roger Pielke Sr. of the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences at the University of Colorado. “This means that if landscape change in a region results in less vegetation, the maximum surface temperatures are expected to be hotter. If an oasis is developed by irrigation from subsurface water in a desert, the maximum temperatures would be less.”
For a case study, Running, Mildrexler, and Zhao took an intensive look at the Pacific Northwest of the United States. “In the Pacific Northwest, there is a spectacular ecological gradient of biomes and temperatures from coast to rainforest to desert within a few hundred miles,” says Running. It is a near-perfect location to demonstrate how land cover relates the capacity of the surface to absorb and radiate heat.
In densely forested areas near the coast, land surface temperatures and air temperatures are a close match because trees can use their deep root systems to access soil moisture and cool themselves through evaporation (a process called transpiration). But move east into the farmland and grassland—where there is less soil moisture during the hottest times of year and the plants have much shallower roots—and the temperature readings start to diverge. Finally, the rocky inland deserts heat up spectacularly compared to the coast; they also cool spectacularly at night.
Mildrexler and Running see long-term records of LSTs as a potential tool for monitoring land cover change, particularly through deforestation, urban sprawl, and agricultural irrigation. Put simply: if skin temperatures are rising or falling over time, it could be an indication of a change in land use.
“During the highest temperatures of the year, forests are much cooler than cleared land, so if a forest is cut down, the land surface temperature will go up,” they wrote in 2011 in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. “This can be seen in the Amazon. In other locations, irrigated crops are cooler than natural vegetation because they have more water to draw upon, and cool themselves through evaporation.”
But LSTs also reveal a lot about our increasingly urban life. As Stuart Gaffin notes: “I see surface temperatures in the city that routinely exceed what you might find in the desert.”
Gaffin studies the urban heat island effect—the propensity of cities to trap heat and grow considerably warmer than the surrounding natural environment. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, an urban area will often see air temperatures up to 6°C (10°F) hotter than the surrounding suburban and rural areas.
The resolution of most satellite sensors— the area depicted within each pixel of an image—is too coarse to observe LSTs in the tight and variable confines of a city. In the University of Montana study, for instance, the LST data had a spatial resolution of approximately 5.6 square kilometers. When viewed through a pixel of that size, cities contain a lot of shadows from buildings and vegetation that result in lower LSTs compared to a uniformly hot desert.
So Gaffin uses portable infrared radiometers—similar to the MODIS instruments—to measure surface temperatures in New York City. They have observed LSTs on the black tar-paper rooftops of the city between 77 to 82°C (170 to 180°F) in mid-summer, amplifying the oppressiveness of summer by radiating extra heat both by day and at night. Even in winter, rooftop temperatures can be tens of degrees warmer than local air temperatures.
Gaffin is particularly interested in how rooftops and other flat, impervious surfaces concentrate heat, and in how they can be made to reflect more. The city has more than 77 square kilometers (30 square miles) of roof space that qualifies as “tar beaches.” It also has been blooming with new synthetic grass fields that mimic real grass and soil in dark color and texture, but don’t mimic the most important quality: the capacity to store and release water. Synthetic fields are like deserts in the city, with no moisture to cool the surface, so temperatures on these fields can approach the skin-burning levels of black pavement.
Gaffin and colleagues have been working for nearly a decade to find creative solutions to reduce heat island effects and LSTs in cities, such as resurfacing rooftops with white paint or with low-maintenance, lightweight vegetation. It is a matter of energy conservation and of quality of life. Rising LSTs lead to higher air temperatures, and a city that cooks itself through heat absorption has to spend more money and energy to cool itself.
“About 3.5 billion people now live in cities,” Gaffin notes. “We have two forces—urban heat islands and global warming—that are reinforcing each other and are going to create periodic, extreme conditions for more than half the world’s population. How do we make cities more habitable in the future?”