|
GRACE measures changes in Earth’s
gravity field by measuring the distance between the two satellites every
five seconds. In a way, you could say the GRACE satellites only have
eyes for each other; they aren’t really looking at the Earth. Using
raw GRACE measurements, all the scientists can tell is that at a specific
point above the Earth, the two satellites were closer together or farther
apart than they were five seconds ago. They can’t tell much else;
the raw data is just a distance measurement and a position over the planet.
Hundreds of kilometers below them, something above, below, or beneath
Earth’s surface caused gravity to pull a little harder or a little
weaker on the satellites as they moved overhead, and the scientists have
the challenge of figuring out what caused the change.
So what is that something? According to Watkins, “It could be
almost anything,” and that makes the job of sorting out the signal
quite difficult. There are rapid and slow changes caused by everything
from the shifting of water in the oceans, to the movement of water vapor
and other components in the atmosphere, to the shifting of solid rock
in the lithosphere. Other changes can occur due to tidal effects caused
by the Sun and the Moon. The different topographic features along the
satellite’s path—mountain ranges, deep ocean trenches, rock
formations rich in heavy, dense metal—also influence the gravity
field. The gravity field can even change in response to topographic features
that have not been present for millennia. For example, the Earth’s
crust is still “rebounding” from the massive weight that
was removed when the glaciers retreated at the end of the last ice age.
Before the hydrologists can use the data, the GRACE Science Team has
to sort out all of these different effects.
| |
|
|
There are some gravity effects that change extremely rapidly, some almost
minute by minute. This might include ocean tides or weather systems moving
across the planet. Sometimes the variability in the gravity field over
one month can be as large as the average value for the month, but GRACE
can’t detect this variability. When GRACE collects data, it doesn’t
scan the whole Earth at once. It takes about a month for the whole Earth
to be sampled. This means that GRACE cannot view the Earth quickly enough
to measure the fastest changes in the gravity field from space. Therefore,
in order to prepare the gravity solution for use in hydrological applications,
the changes that occur over a timescale shorter than one month, mostly
related to the atmosphere and ocean, have to be accounted for using models.
Otherwise, the estimate of the monthly average gravity field would not
be as reliable for use by the hydrologists.
The monthly average gravity field maps provided to hydrologists like
Wahr and Rodell have been corrected for these rapid variations. However,
there are still lingering effects of atmospheric and oceanic phenomena
that change over monthly intervals or longer that must be taken into
account before they can isolate water storage change. Using model simulations
of the atmosphere, ocean, and solid Earth, the hydrologists can clean
up any leftover, non-water-related-effects, and what they end up with
is a “corrected” gravity field that represents only the effects
of water movement. |
|
The changes in Earth’s
gravity signal caused by water storage can be overshadowed by changes caused
by movements in the atmosphere and oceans. The image above is the result
of a computer model that predicted where and by how many millimeters these
atmosphere and ocean movements would have increased or decreased the average
gravity signal in August 2002 compared to the yearly average for 2001.
Yellows, oranges, and reds are places where the average August gravity
signal was higher than the 2001 average, while greens, blues, and purples
show where it was lower. (Image credit: Paul Thompson / UT-CSR) |
|
But, there is still the issue of how to account for the influence of
the Earth’s topography. The influence of the geographical variation
in the Earth’s mass on the gravity field is much larger than that
of water storage, and errors in the solution for the mean field could
obscure the smaller water storage signals. Hydrologists get around this
problem by comparing GRACE observations from two different time periods
and assuming that any change observed is caused by water storage. After
all, we can pretty much count on the fact that if a mountain was in a
particular place last month, it will be in the same place this month,
and thus its effect on the gravity field will be the same from month
to month. By looking at the average monthly gravity field from two different
time periods and taking a difference between the two, the part of the
signal that is more or less constant over short time intervals cancels
out and what remains is the change in the gravity field caused by water
storage change. Wahr and Rodell can then relate this value to an equivalent
water level change in a specific region by using a simple conversion
that describes how much water it would take to produce the mass change
that GRACE observed over the region.
Thus, this GRACE technique is not a way to measure exact water storage
amounts from space, it can only tell us how water storage changes with
time. Therefore, this technique cannot be used to measure how much water
is stored in the Mississippi River Basin at a particular instant in time,
but it can certainly be used to see how the water storage changes in
that area over a month, a season, or a year. Such information can be
extremely useful for water resource managers.
Honing
in on Groundwater
Pioneering
a New Technology
|
|
The Earth’s gravity signal
changes day-to-day, even minute by minute. The image above shows how
the average variability in Earth’s gravity field in August 2002 compared
to the average variability during 2001. The red and pink areas show where
the variation measured in August 2002 is the most different from the variation
measured for the year 2001, while the blue and purple areas show where
the variation measured in August 2002 is just about the same as the variation
measured for the year 2001. The variability has to be accounted for using
models in order to produce a mean gravity field that is useful for hydrologic
applications. (Image credit: Paul Thompson / UT-CSR) |