| |
In lakes, water quality relates directly to water clarity, says
Patrick Brezonik. He is the Director of the Water Resources Center at the
University of Minnesota and has been testing the waters in the Upper Great Lakes
region for the past 20 years. He says that in scientific terms a lake with high
water quality is known as an oligotrophic lake. Such a lake has clean, clear
water with little algae. Its what most of us think of when we imagine a
pristine lake in an untouched pine forest. At the other end of the spectrum are
hypereutrophic lakes. These polluted lakes are typically murky, smelly, and
overgrown with algae and exotic plants. |
|
|
| |
Brezonik explains that lakes in the Upper Midwest typically deteriorate due
to runoff from farms, urban areas, industry, and construction sites. The storm
water runoff will often carry chemicals and sediments from these locations into
nearby lakes. Sediments can cloud a lake, and nutrients in the sediments,
particularly phosphorous, can cause unwanted algae to grow. While the
degradation is gradual, once a lake has become hypereutrophic, it is very
difficult to reverse the damage.
A large drop in water quality can impact both the wildlife and the people in
and around the lake. Rough fish such as catfish and carp multiply and replace
higher quality fish such as small mouth bass and pike. Algae, bacteria, and
chemicals can affect the health of people and animals who fish and swim in the
lakes. In addition, many small towns throughout the Upper Great Lakes region
depend on tourist dollars to keep their economies afloat, and an algae-filled
lake turns away summer vacationers.
Its important for both the surrounding communities and the
environment that lakes are monitored on a regular basis, says Brezonik.
For the past century, the Secchi disk has been the standard instrument for
monitoring water quality. Pioneered by Italian physicist Pietro Angelo Secchi
in 1865, the Secchi disk is an 8-inch disk painted in an alternating black and
white pattern. A person in a boat lowers the disk into the lake and records the
depth at which it disappears from sight. This depth, known as the Secchi depth,
is the measure of water clarity. In Minnesota, oligotrophic lakes have a Secchi
depth of 16 feet or greater, and hypereutrophic lakes have a Secchi depth of
only a few feet or less. If a lake is hypereutrophic, its then up to the
researcher or resource manager to determine the cause. |
|
Hallet Lake (left) and Schwanz Lake (right),
both in Minnesota, are representative of very good and very bad water quality. Hallet
lake is oligotrophic, with very clear water. On the other hand Schwanz Lake is hypereutrophic,
with murky water that is choked with algae. (Photographs courtesy Upper Great Lakes
Regional Earth Science Applications Center) |
| |
Although Secchi depths provide an excellent classification system for
limnologists, taking such measurements is labor intensive. The person making the
measurements has to take a boat to the open part of the lake, slowly drop in the
Secchi disk, record its readings, and then repeat the process at several other
locations. While Secchi disk measurements work well for small numbers of lakes,
they are not practical for monitoring the over 30,000 lakes in Michigan,
Minnesota, and Wisconsin.
Tom Lillesand, the director of the Environmental Remote Sensing Center at the
University of Wisconsin, explains that the states of the Upper Great Lakes
region have modest budgets with which to monitor lakes. In Wisconsin we
have a budget to sample lakes, but it allows agencies such as the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources to perform a complete water quality physical
exam on 50 to 100 lakes, which is less than one percent of the
states lakes, he says. With such minimal coverage scientists cannot
obtain a comprehensive picture of water quality across the state, and they
cannot follow trends in water quality across the state over time.
Light from the Waves
Testing the Waters
|
|
Water quality measurements are typically done by
hand with a Secchi disk. Although the measurements are accurate, it would be very expensive to
conduct them by hand on a large scale. The photographs show decreasing water quality from left to right.
(Photographs courtesy Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) |