Modeling Earth's Land Biosphere
Modeling Earth's Land Biosphere   by David Herring
September 10, 1999

Page 2
What if we could simultaneously observe the production of green vegetation by land plants all over the world? We can't, but if we could, what would we learn about how land plants respond as meteorological conditions change every day? And what would the response of land plants teach us about where, when, and how much carbon dioxide is being exchanged with the terrestrial ecosystem?

net primary productivity

Because we cannot directly observe these things, forest ecologist Steven Running and his research team at the University of Montana constructed a computer model of the Earth's terrestrial biosphere that he expects will teach us a great deal about the dynamic interactions between land plants and the lower atmosphere. The model enables him to watch as changes in the biosphere literally ripple across continents in response to meteorological changes (Ford et al. 1994).

"We can watch daily photosynthetic activity as plants react to changes in weather patterns and storm tracks going across continents," Running says. "Suppose it is in the middle of the growing season. A storm comes through that drops temperatures from the 70°F to the 50°F range, and the skies go from sunny to cloudy. The biosphere will react by dropping its rate of photosynthesis. We can see this response sweep across the landscape over a period of hours."

What is a computer model?
Elissa Levine, a soil scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, explains that a computer model is a numerical representation created to simulate a real system. "We use models," Levine says, "because we don't always have access to the real system at the desired scales of time and space."

According to Levine, scientists don't have enough information about the Earth's processes to understand how they function as a whole, integrated system over time. We know that ecosystems vary greatly from local to global scales. Yet, in order to characterize how these ecosystems function, scientists need to generalize across each region (Weishampel et al. 1999). Scientists put the information they know about a system--as either numerical measurements, or theoretical estimates--into a model and in turn the model tells them two things: (1) how the inputs respond to each other, and (2) where there are gaps in their knowledge that need to be filled.

Levine works with two types of models: (1) simulation models and (2) data-driven models. Simulation models use equations that are written into a program that acts as a copy of a real system. Inputs that make the model run are things like site conditions (soil properties, land cover, slope, aspect, latitude, longitude, etc.), temperature, and precipitation values. The types of simulation models she works with are at the "process" level, which means they look at the system at the local level that gives details of how specific mechanisms work. The results of these models can then be generalized to larger, coarser scales (Knox et al. 1997). When the model is run, the equations work together to make a prediction about a certain part of the ecosystem that is being simulated (such as the amount of moisture in the soil at a certain depth and time, the amount of photosynthesis occurring at a certain time, etc.).

  npp palette

These three maps of North America show the amount of carbon (in the form of carbon dioxide) used by plants over a one-year period. This is called net primary productivity, and is related to the growth rates of green vegetation. Understanding the exchange of carbon dioxide between the biosphere and the atmosphere is critical to predicting global climate change.

Each image is based on the output of a different computer model, each of which used current climate conditions and carbon dioxide concentrations to calculate plant productivity. (Image courtesy of the University of Montana Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group)


Net Primary Productivty
Computer models can fill in the blanks left by satellite remote sensing and in-situ measurements. Scientists at the University of Montana produced this animation of daily net primary productivity (carbon uptake by plants) from model results. Green represents carbon being consumed by vegetation (positive productivity), while tan shades are carbon being released back into the atmosphere (negative productivity). (Image by Robert Simmon, based on data provided by the University of Montana Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group)

The second type of model uses observed measurements that scientists have collected across the globe to generalize real processes and properties seen in nature. Levine uses Geographic Information System (GIS) software tools to combine maps and other types of data from satellite sensors (such as land cover, soil types, and climate data). Then, she applies models that use techniques such as statistics or "neural networks" to interpret the real relationships between each of the different layers of data. [A neural network is a system of multiple computer processors connected together so that they share information via a common program that enables them to "learn" by trial and error in a manner similar to the way the human brain works.]

For example, Levine uses satellite images of land surface overlain on soil data and, together with the GIS software and a neural network, relates soil properties with the spectral signatures from the satellite image. These signatures are colors of light that are reflected (both visible and infrared light) by the vegetation and other objects on the ground. Using the relationships that are derived from this information, Levine’s model can make predictions about soil carbon and other properties for areas where there are little or no data (Levine and Kimes 1997).

When the model predicts something interesting or unexpected, Levine says, then it is time to go make more measurements.

next Why Build Computer Models?

The data used in this study are available in one or more of NASA's Earth Science Data Centers.

model example
Data-driven models combine many types of observations to derive information that is difficult or impossible to directly measure. In this case, Dr. Levine used topography, vegetation index, and in-situ soil sample data from selected sites to estimate soil carbon content throughout Brazil's Amazon Basin. (Image by Robert Simmon and Steve Fifer, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.)

Print this entire article