Why does the Earth Observatory show some floods and not others?

June 21st, 2011 by Michon Scott

Earth Observatory publishes many images of floods. The 2010 monsoon floods in Pakistan and 2011 floods in the Mississippi and Missouri basins have received a lot of coverage.

But we don’t publish photo-like images of every flood, and many readers wonder why. The severe floods affecting China this month are a perfect example. So far, we have only been able to visualize the rainfall in the region.

Multiple factors limit our ability to show floods, but perhaps the biggest is cloud cover. In a hurricane image, the clouds are the story. When it comes to flooding, clouds often hide the very trouble they have caused. An overflowing river or standing water on agricultural fields cannot be observed until clouds clear out of the way. Sometimes cloud cover lingers until the high water has receded.


Clouds obscure most of this MODIS image acquired on June 18, 2011.

And just as some parts of our planet are frequently sunny, other places—including some of the places frequently affected by floods—are consistently cloudy. (See the Cloud Fraction global map for more information.)

The duration and size of events also limit the ability of satellites to see flooding. Destructive as they are, flash floods usually occur so quickly that satellite sensors such as (MODIS) have little chance to observe them. Likewise, a flood can cause serious damage without spanning a wide enough area to be detected by a satellite sensor. When flood waters outlast the storm system that deposits them, a satellite sensor’s ability to observe flooding is improved, but not guaranteed.

Another factor that limits flood observations is land cover. Densely forested environments often hide floods from satellites. Flood waters show up better in grassland and arid environments. High-resolution satellites are successful in observing flooding in some urban areas.

All of these factors are complicated by something else. In the case of hurricanes, wildfires, and dust storms, the events by themselves are obvious enough for anyone to see. Flooding is different. Except for high-resolution shots from urban areas, flooding can be difficult to detect without a “before” image for comparison. So to show flooding, the EO team must not only find a cloud-free image of the flooded area, but also a cloud-free image of the same area under normal conditions.


Flooding in southern Mexico on September 8, 2010 (top), is much easier to detect when compared to pre-flood conditions on September 9, 2009 (bottom).

When prolonged, heavy rain falls at low latitudes, we have a reasonably good chance of seeing it, thanks to the Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis produced at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center. The analysis estimates rainfall by combining measurements from many satellites and calibrating them against rainfall measurements from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite. The heavy rain in China has occurred in the right place and has lasted long enough to be visualized. Cloud cover and land cover, however, have hampered our ability to detect flooding on the ground. We may yet find imagery of this natural disaster. We will keep looking.

2 Responses to “Why does the Earth Observatory show some floods and not others?”

  1. Dirk Werle says:

    Sir/Madame:
    Your article is informative as it points to the importance of Earth observation for flood assessments. Part of the arsenal of useful sensors are a fleet of imaging radar satellites which are worth mention. Synthetic aperture radar, or SAR, sensors aboard the European Envisat and the Canadian RADARSAT satellites, as well as others, have been hugely successful for many years now. A good example of US-Canadian cooperation was recently portrayed at
    http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca/eng/newsletters/eo_express/2011/0616.asp
    (see Item 9 > Richelieu River flood). There are many more examples of optical and radar applications for flood monitoring efforts around the world. US sensors of the optical kind are often an essential component. Yet, satellite radars are equally effective and very reliable tools, especially at the regional scale level. Yes, we CAN see through the clouds! Besides satellite SAR and optical sensor technology, cooperation and coordination are important keys to successful flood monitoring.
    Regards,
    Dirk Werle

  2. Flooding around the world (26 June edition) | Highly Allochthonous says:

    From the Highly Allochthonous blog… Earth Observatory has a couple of images from flood-stricken areas in China. They’ve been plagued by cloudy weather for much of the last couple of weeks (very much related to the cause of the flooding!).
    See their flood updates at http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/